and functional speech 5 candidates
in presidential election Peru's 2011
By Jorge Yeshayahu Gonzales-Lara
The televised debate has been positioned as one of the most attractive events of the political campaign in general and presidential elections in Peru . For the first time in the history of Peru there are 5 candidates who have alternated at the top of several polls. Keiko Sofia Fujimori's daughter, who ruled Peru in 1990-2000 and ended Lesan sentenced for crimes that humanity, Luis Castaneda Lossio, who resigned in 2010 for mayor of Lima which held from 2003 to run for president, ex-president Alejandro Toledo during the period 2001-2006, which came lead to several polls, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski Peruvian by birth and naturalized U.S. citizen, ex-Minister Alejandro Toledo, and Ollanta Humala, a retired military to rise up against the dictatorship of Alberto Fujimori and institutionalized corruption that former presidential advisor Family Fujimori, Vladimiro Montesinos.
The realization of the debates between the major candidates, in what was considered a historical event, it is because part of the discussions easier for citizens to compare the performance of each of the candidates with their respective policy proposals, and the possibility of evaluating the character of the candidates in a spontaneous situation that other media content constituencies, such as radio spots, print and television, or rallies. However, the debate has also represented a risk for them because, although they can prepare for these, it is impossible to predict with exacititud the behavior of the other candidates. The televised debate between candidates has shown to be capable of generating a political apprenticeship in the audience.
The discourse of political debate can be considered as a functional speech because it was geared to a specific purpose: to reaffirm the vote that guarantees you pass the second round or change the preference of the electorate vote and presented positively to the Through a hearing political discourse of persuasion while showing negatively by attacking opponents, and seeking to redress the damage caused by the participating teams defenses. The electoral debate was marked by the following premises:
a) Voting is a comparative exercise.
b) Applicants must differentiate themselves from their opponents.
c) campaign messages allow candidates to distinguish themselves.
d) Candidates can set preference cheers THROUGH attacks and defenses.
e) The speech can be considered political issues or candidates.
The debate allowed the candidates to distinguish themselves in the pursuit of a new form TV to politics, but also a risk situation to assess the character of candidates.
0 comments:
Post a Comment